It does not replace the policy, which is fully applicable to logos.Ĭompany logos may appear in articles on those companies, but note that, if challenged, it is the responsibility of those who wish to include the logo to prove that its use meets Wikipedia non-free content criteria.
#Her interactive logo free
Unlike people, however, where it is often possible to take a free photograph of that person, logos are typically protected by copyright and trademark law and so cannot be replaced by a completely free alternative.Ĭopyright concerns Uploading non-free logos This section offers advice on applying the non-free content criteria to logos. Logos should be regarded as portraits for a given entity. The encyclopedic rationale for including a logo is similar to the rationale for including portraits of a famous actor: most users feel that portraits provide valuable information about the person that is difficult to describe solely with text. Third, there are editorial issues about adhering to a neutral point of view and selecting an appropriate logo and representation.
Second, logos are often registered trademarks and so their use is restricted independently of copyright concerns. First, they are usually non-free images, and so their use must conform to the guidelines for non-free content and, specifically, the non-free content criteria. There are three main concerns with logo use. Many images of logos are used on Wikipedia and long standing consensus is that it is acceptable for Wikipedia to use logos belonging to others for encyclopedic purposes. This page in a nutshell: When using images of logos, care must be taken about copyright, trademark and editorial concerns.
0 kommentar(er)
